Nomenclature
What
are we? Who are you? Who am I?
Most
often, the answer to that question will begin with a name. When someone says
“tell me about yourself”, we often start with our name. It seems trite to say,
but it ought to be said: there’s power in names. The need to have the ability to self-identify is a powerful
driving force for all of us. Take away a person’s name or their ability to
choose/keep their name and you erase them. If you tell someone everything about
who you are without ever telling them your name, that disclosure often feels
incomplete, devoid of intimacy, sterile, barren.
Despite
the power in names, it’s ironic that for most people, we never get to choose
our names. Our names are given to us, assigned, and the most that happens for
some of us, if we even consciously think of it, is that we come to make peace
with the names we were given. We come to accept them as a part of us even
though we never asked for it, like a birth mark you can’t be rid of, even if
you wanted to. Ask yourself: if you could change your name, would you? What
would you call yourself if you were given that choice?
The
ability to decide our own names is one of the fundamental things that makes us
different from all other creatures. That
sense of personal freedom to chart our own course begins with this. To know our
names, the names we have chosen for ourselves, whether as an affirmative act or
by accepting the names we were given, is
to begin to know who we are.
But
names are not static, they are dynamic, fluid, they exist in a state of ebb and
flow. The name you identified with yesterday may change, you may see yourself
as someone different, better, but always, it comes down to choice. Did you
choose that name? Is it yours?
We
may have multiple identities, fluid and interweaving. We may be called
something different by our parents, friends, enemies and everyone in between.
We may have different online identities, but each name is no less real. In a
sense, the name itself is the least important element of a confluence of
abstractions and existential quandaries (who am I? What does my name
represent?), but as long as you in some way chose that name for yourself, that
is sufficient. In the moment, you are secure, your existential dilemma is
resolved because it was a conscious decision, either to take that name or to keep
the one you were given.
All
the different names we have: our ‘real’ names, our online names, Instagram, Facebook and Twitter handles, that combination of names is a mosaic of who we
are. Each one is an important element of what makes us ‘us’. We all need to be
able to affirmatively embrace our names. We have the power, if our names cause
us grief, or anguish or pain to create new identities for ourselves, to create new
beings.
But
with the great power to create ourselves through nomenclature, comes the great
responsibility to respect the choices of others in how they choose to be named.
Respect who they are and they reciprocate. If we were all happy in our names
and we respected the choices of others, maybe then we can begin to be happy in
ourselves.
There’s
power in pseudonyms. They are often just as real as our true names, but there’s
something powerful too, about shedding anonymity (or the facsimile of
anonymity) and stepping out into the disinfectant glare of the sun.
Who
am I?
My
name is Andrew Arthur Juldeh Kaikai. I'm just me.
Can you feel the sun washing over me? Can you see the sun watching over me? |
Well said, Lloyd Webber. ;)
ReplyDeleteAlso, very timely with the Je Suis Charlie fallout that's about to burst through the dam...
Thanks Elena :)
ReplyDeleteI would change the handle, but it would be incongruous with the URL/domain name, so for now, it remains a reminder of who I once was trying to be.
Ahh, yes, "Je suis ..." the go-to way to show solidarity on social media. I understand the appeal, but I'll say, that for most people, it is easy to say that when you know that you are not "Charlie" and will never have to go through what he did